Abhijit Speaks :

On Life, Technology, Stocks and Movies

Analyzing the election results..

with 5 comments

Mr. Market always gets it right – as one of my friends Harish would say it. If you’ve to follow the election results, they are always priced in by the market.  The ‘charts’ were clearly showing a very favourable market result, the question was how much.. (note: This is not with the benefit of hindsight)

I had offered to my friends even before a single vote was cast that it’d most likely be going to be congress, with even a better mandate than last time, ofcourse however I kept asking myself where the numbers would come from? The reason I was thinking along these  lines was fairly straightforward for me – Though there was a considerable negativity about the present government then, there was not a factor that could sweep against it, and people were generally Okay with MM Singh . The arrogance of the third and fourth front was clearly a precursor to what lied ahead for them (perhaps they were not confident enough or over confident that’d work against them.) Though I still expected BJP to do substantially better than what it did in the recent elections.What came as a surprise was the result in Maharashtra – for I was inclined towards a favourable outcome for BJP-SS vs. INC-NCP. The MNS factor was much larger than  I had thought that made the results look much different than what they were.

I even told my friends the biggest suprise will come from UP and it’d either go in favour of Congress or BJP and whoever wins there is likely to make it to the poll position.

There was an easy parallel to draw between this election and the 2004 US presidents election, where everything that could conceivably go wrong against Bush was wrong and yet he managed to get elected with a record-breaking victory. The situation looked vastly similar over here for the Congress (that was one of my main thesis for predicting an easier congress win.)

My friend Harish offered me that left would be decimated in this election and he said I’d be surprised if they cross 20 in this election. Frankly, I had no idea about the politics in Kerala or WB, but he was certainly right about it.

Now lets look at the results more closely and see what ‘themes emerge’. First and the most important thing is – The national elections in India are largely Federal. Every state votes for a very localized issue and a sum total of all that happens eventually results into a national mandate. So the numbers do lie to some extent. I am not sure whether such a federal nature of election is the right choice that the voters make or if it is so, does it not make sense to look more closely at our democratic system more closely and move towards a much more Federal structure?

For the congress – First heartiest congratulations for showing the best ever performance since 1991. And most of that Credit goes to Rahul Gandhi he’s that nice-likable-can-do-nothing-wrong type of a guy and has delivered for its party and lets give the credit where it is due.Mr. MM Singh deserves his fair share of the credit for being a soft-spoken guy and bringing a credible image for the people to vote for (I’d not go ahead and call him performing in any ways.)

Lessons for BJP from this election – There’s a long list but I’d briefly go over a few very obvious. The single problem with BJP this time was – it miscalculated the elections as national elections and tried to keep projecting ‘Majboot Neta – Nirnayak Sarkar’. With the benefit of hindsight, I’d say this was a wrong strategy. Had there been a little localized efforts the results would have been notch better (though I still doubt to create any meaningful dent to congress.)

Second and it is the most important lesson – they’ve to ask themselves where’s their next level of Growth coming from? It seems like they cannot go beyond their presence in the few states.

Third – it’s much easier for a voter to shift towards Congress than other way round, that has been amply demonstrated in several elections across several states (when there’s no choice, Congress becomes a default choice) so it is of fundamental importance to make sure not to loose whatever you get. (Rajasthan and Delhi a few years ago case in point..)

Fourth – Evaluate the allies – if they are not working get rid of the baggage (and build from the ground up again and not look for different allies.) ‘cos it seems the allies that work for you eventually want to get rid of you (BJD and JDU case in point..) so you may have to evaluate the long term benefits of going alone vis-a-vis short term losses (which are not going to be big anyways)

For the regional parties – Have they lost relevance? Quite the contrary, the way they could play it is – taking a senior role in the local politics but offering a senior role to one of the national parties in national politics is important and staying away from opportunism is extremely important. You have to make a choice to go with either of the parties (or none at all) and stick to that stand forever, people don’t like jockying on different horses. They wait and wait patiently before they say enough is enough. (Ram Vilas Paswan case in point.) and the presence of regional parties in the other state is of even greater importance where one of the two national parties is clearly ahead because they keep the necessary checks.

For the next general elections though the task will be cut out for Congress, remember replicating an extraordinary performance is lot harder than doing somewhat better than last time and yet do good enough (that should be the only silver lining for the BJP.)

The task cut out for the next government is substantial (and I am of the opinion Governments can’t and generally don’t do anything useful,  but they can cause harm. With the present government the later seems an unlikely scenario in the short term atleast.) and hope they live upto it atleast 50bips to the par.

To the voters at large – I am completely at a loss to comprehend the complete apathy of the voter for the elections. Perhaps to a large extent many of them believe that whom they vote for doesn’t make a difference with the government in center. To an extent they may be right, but I’d urge everyone to vote in your local elections – the corporations and the vidhansabha because, their outcomes directly affect our day to day life (Pune Corporation and the Debris problem a case in point here.)

Finally, I’d like to conclude with an interesting thought that came to my mind and an analogy if I could call it to draw – Congress is like Microsoft – they are everywhere, anywhere you go you’ve to fight them. BJP is more like Yahoo, has got an act of screwing up when the least needed. The natural Question is  – Who is Google? BSP ( I know some of my friends would laugh at it) or they are still two guys in a garage?

Written by gabhijit

May 17, 2009 at 12:18 pm

Posted in 2009, elections, life

Tagged with , ,

5 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Not a surprise at all – you always analyze very nicely :)
    I agree on most of your analysis and particularly your view that this was not a “national event” as thought by BJP.

    I have few things to say though –

    BJP miscalculated on many fronts –
    1. They projected Advani but then Modi ghost resurfaced.
    2. They miscalculated on the issue of “terrorism”, esp after Mumbai event.
    3. The repeated statements on MM (him being weak etc) by Advani was a bad idea.
    4. The biggest thing that went against them is not being mentioned by anyone – it was the opposition of Nuclear Deal! They tried to be smart, they tried to convey the message that they are “for” the “deal” but “on some grounds” they opposed it. This was expecting every middle class Indian to know the intricacies which is unimaginable!

    Left Parites: I managed to guess it right about left and my reason behind that was the “drama” on “nuclear deal”. If we had a referendum on this issue, we would get almost sweeping mandate in favour of it.

    Also, the Singur episode did not do well for them. Even a fool will not accept so called communists to hand over farmers’ land to industrialist, however noble their intentions might be (I doubt on “noble” though).

    Congress: Congress, as the results show, did do unexpectedly well. The right things they managed to do were -
    1. Kept power hungry big netas of their party silent and project MM as PM candidate.
    2. Rahul’s idea of going alone in UP.
    3. Not getting involved too much into Advani’s attack on MM.
    4. Projecting that they “managed to keep India mostly better than others” despite global economic crisis and not allowing BJP to raise the “manhgai” issue.

    However, I still feel Congress would have done much better if – they had let the govt fail when left withdrew support and project that as “betrayal” by left to the govt as well as nation’s growth. At that time “common people” saw Left as enemies of nation. I don’t understand why analysts miscalculate on “America” factor. Its no secret that most Indians like America. Those who think “American hatred” can win them “all muslim” votes are living in dreams.

    Third and Fourth Front: They did their best to dig holes for them by being undecided. If there were only one front, then there could be some chance but how could SP and BSP go together? And the damage by left would still be substantial.

    P.S. : I consider myself a novice in politics and my political inclination is towards Joseph Agassi :)

    Harry

    May 17, 2009 at 2:15 pm

  2. Well, what you’ve described is a “micro analysis” I generally don’t go into that. For I don’t have the amount of patience needed for that kind of rigour. Most of my analysis is based upon – What I broadly call “Price Action”.

    Congress clearly had ‘a plan for the elections’ (long before anyone ever thought) eminently visible from a lot of their steps (I am saying this with the benefit of hindsight) – Timing of the National Rural Employment Guarantee Act. Timing of Farmer Waivers (note: they didn’t do it too early so that people forget about it. and didn’t do it too late, so that it looks obviously populist.) Leting inflation run out of control last year and setting higher base so that the current 1-2% inflation looks soothing (and no one can capitalize on ‘mahangai’) (While I know this will sound ridiculous to everyone who knows – may be 26-11 was part of that plan). I can just go on and on and on.

    Overall, this buttresses my theory that we’ve discussed in the past. I don’t think the current breed of Congressman have the smartness to plan it this well. There is someone working behind the scenes, and you know my take on it and BJP just don’t have a match for that kind of thinking, and frankly I doubt they’d ever have it….

    But those are less important points in the current election analysis.

    gabhijit

    May 17, 2009 at 3:10 pm

  3. Oh! I missed one thing – the “Indian Black Money in Foreign” thing. I guess people of this country have become more intelligent (remember bofors?) They know the fact that no politician in his senses will ever try that thing! :) So they just passed this “imaginary idea”…

    Harry

    May 17, 2009 at 3:11 pm

  4. I think BJP has to change its basic stance.

    1. The Hindutva agenda is past its sell-by date.

    2. They have to look at the youth. In Congress, there are guys like Sachin Pilot, Rahul Gandhi and a few others. Priyanka, if not anything else, adds a little bit of glamor.

    I don’t see the involvement of youth in BJP. Those who are there are probably part of RSS and are busy in Shakhas. They are not contesting elections.

    3. Indian elections are NOT about policies etc. It is about cast, religion and community voting en-mass. You may have good policies, but to come out on top, you need to get votes first, and you can’t win if you don’t have friends in a community. Frankly, BJP is NOT a “godbole” party.


    Aditya Kulkarni

    Aditya Kulkarni

    May 18, 2009 at 11:47 am

  5. Just to substantiate the point #3 I made above, look at how Suresh Kalmadi has won from Pune on last 3 occasions. IMHO, he has not done anything substantial for Pune except making big statements and getting those games to Pune. Still he keeps winning each time.


    Aditya Kulkarni

    Aditya Kulkarni

    May 18, 2009 at 11:51 am


Leave a Reply