Flashback : Forget Reservations We’ve bigger fish to fry..
In the flashback series, I will be posting my older posts that were somewhere else. I’d try to update the posts so as to make them relevant in the present context. This is second of the flashback series.
There has been a considerable ruckus about the proposed reservation system in the IITs and IIMs. Though, this issue is important and deserves attention and dialogue, there is a far more important issue, largely un-noticed, which calls for a much diligent attention. The issue at large is that of the “education system” in India. We need to fix some basic building blocks before we can argue about the issues which are largely peripheral, yes I consider the issue of “reservations” a largely peripheral issue. Let”s get started.
First and foremost, the education system under which most of us have studied is, “Lord Macaulay”s gift to us, the system developed to create “babus” that will obey and ask not many questions, serving the purpose of the “empire”. Post independence, in our “tryst with destiny” did we undertake any educational reforms? Did we ask ourselves the questions, is this the education system, on which we will found the “Independent Nation”? The answer is loud “NO”. We just carried forward the education as we did largely with law, post and railways. We did certainly miss an opportunity there, an important one. And the present state where we are is largely a consequence of such ignorance.
Once we never paid any attention to serious education, we employed the system of reservations for the under-priviledged. Which probably made some sense five decades ago. But the very system did fail to create a young generation which asked questions and thus we created babus, yet again, not serving the cause of “empire” this time, but learned (rather literate) and busy maintaining status quo. The result is where we stand today. If one notices, the state funded schools (one of the schools where I myself studied) are suffering from lack of funds to hire any serious teachers, further aggravated by the mandatory reservations for teachers, where a student is denied a quality education. In comes the “International School” (and they have very funny names, some have names like “Education Valley” just like “Amby Valley” and one went on to the extentof naming one school “Sharad Pawar International School”. Naming “National School” would have been adventurous enough!), run by private organizations, charging exorbitant fees. Now this leads to a bigger problem, that is – access to these schools is possible to the people who can afford to send their children to these “International Schools” ie. well to do people or the IT upstarts. I am not too sure about the quality of education in the international schools, which may be good. But the proliferation of such “elite only” school has fundamental bearing on the upbringing of a child, in a broader sense. I will narrate my experience and juxtapose it with that of my nephews”. The school where I studied had admittedly horrible teachers and a few good ones too but it had students from all the strata of the society, economically and socially. That was important, because I was never blinded by the fact that the world is just composed of my “alikes” economically and socially. When I talk with my nephews, they have friends whose parents are from a very similar background as theirs. This results in a certain degree of monotonity in experience and that is a child”s great loss!! Thus we are encouraging almost silently, the society being divided, right from the word go, between the ones who can afford and who cannot.
Further, about the way merit is determined in our examination system, is based on the result of one particular examination and examinations can easily be hacked. And what about someone who has been good but just falls sick on the day of examination, should he be denied access to (supposedly) better education? And certain entrance examinations are our gateway to “premiere institutions”. More about that later. This issue can alone be discussed at length, but thats for some other time.
Shouldn”t it be considered primary responsibilty of the Government to ensure, free and compulsory, primary education (primary education the way I will like to define is – education upto the higher secondary school in the present british education system)? Have we not failed miserably in that? About the subject of reservation, it is important for the Government to understand, that once you make it free and compulsory, there is no question of reservations that exists.
Lets come now to the state of education at slightly higher levels, graduation – the engineering/medical colleges etcetra. At best, it is just prudent to keep mum about those, since the ones who have attended those will tell you the real story about the politicians’ cash cows. I am not going to speak about the non-professional graduate colleges (like science/arts/commerce colleges), for I have no first hand experience about them, but if one looks around with an open eye, the answers are there for every one.
Lets come to the premiere education systems now and deal with the issue of reservations quickly. If you ask my opinion, it is simple – “If yo ensure that access to free and compulsory primary education is guaranteed to every child, it is really not required to have any provisions later on.” But the problem with our premiere institutions is not just that of “reservations”, they do suffer from a bigger problem, and having studied in one of them, allows me to speak with a certain degree of authenticity about it and its not just notional. Lets ask ourselves an honest question – “What is the value that the premiere education institutes aka IITs and IIMs delivered to our nation?” They surely boast of “great alumni network” but have they constitued any meaningful, measurable value to the society as a whole? Or are they just “high profile bodyshops”? The situation is largely so – for they are known for, thanks to our media, the highest dollar paychecks that student get once they graduate from these institutes. The quality of education and that of the faculty is beyond doubt first grade, but the value contributed to the society remains almost miniscule.
A few concluding remarks – We need fundamental reforms, similar if not greater in magnitude like the economical reforms (supposedly) undertaken in early nineties by then finance minister. But human resource development is not certainly the most saught after porfolio in Goverment, and the ones who get that, are busy edititng textbooks, making astrology compulsory and reservations in the premier institutes. There is a call for a large government initiated, private funded overhaul, that will start building things ground up rather than patching up leaks. This requires far greater determination and conviction, and Mr. Arjun Singh is not the only one who is guilty of lack of that. After all people deserve the government they get.
A few more inputs, if I may be so bold.
You’re right about our not having revisited our education system in a long time. Having said that, even for all the serious brainpower in our administrative echelons (no sarcasm intended, I was referring to the bureaucrats, not the politicians), educational reforms are a nontrivial problem. I, for one, would have no idea where to begin. If we bring out a fantastic, progressive teacher-driven programme that stresses on innovation and grades children based on a multitude of factors, where on earth would we find the teachers to really run this scheme? As of last month, I was still reading about schools in rural Maharashtra (less than 200 km from Pune) where 12-year-old girls were teaching 7-year-olds, because there were no teachers for the younger classes. It can’t be better in the less prosperous states.
As with problems in computer engineering, social engineering problems become daunting when they take on larger scale.
One alternative would be to recognize that there are different sections of the population with different expectations from education and have vocational tracks for these people. For example, I know of an example (again, in rural Maharashtra) where a single arts/science/commerce college serves a catchment area having a 50-kilometre radius. Why is there an arts/science/commerce college there? What are the locals going to do with a degree in Hindi Literature or a B.Sc. in chemistry? Why not a vocational school? Focused on local occupations perhaps? Maybe agriculture? Forestry? Mining?
As to why we don’t revise the educational system, allow me to venture a guess – it’s because it’s just too damn tough. It requires amazing amounts of thought, and a plan that goes at least 20-30 years into the future. Oh, and a little bit of money would help, too. This, in a time when degree college professors get their salaries one or two months late, and new teachers in colleges make 100 USD a month (actual figures) is a bit much to expect. In other words, this is an optimization problem with a heck of a lot of variables, and where your optimal solution is impossible to reach in < ~20 years, and there’s nobody who wants to wait 20 years for a result, or solve a problem this tough. You have to think of an education for the guy who wants to get an education and just run his farm more efficiently and not get screwed out of his money by the trading middleman. You have to think of the rural housewife who wants to get an education and just be a more efficient homemaker (central to rural asset structure). You have to think of the ambitious lot who want to study higher and get vocational degrees and just get a job. You need to cater to the guys who will form the backbone of our burgeoning services industry. What about the cream, the PhDs, the IITs, and IIMs? Oh, and lest we re-entrench the class system, there must be a way for anyone to study anything, which means that primary education in addition to being free, must also be uniform. Boy, I’m glad I’m not solving this.
It’s much easier to turn on the “reservation” bit. Works in constant time, and as you so astutely observed, takes attention off the real problem.
Suman
May 4, 2008 at 10:12 pm
Suman, Great comment indeed, I have very similar thoughts as yours, but I’d give my shot at how best government can go about “reforms”.
First of all, lets not think of trying to ‘re-design’ every thing from scratch, we just cannot afford that much of down-time. So lets try to fix some simple problems first and gradually move towards education 2.0.
Large part of Education is still controlled by Government at primary/secondary level, government could re-linquish control over it. (It’s just like Telecommunications.. I agree the benefits to the rural India will not come on day one, but over a period of time, the private education will work just the way it has worked in Telecom.)
Second, government should get out of the business of funding colleges/universities, instead they should act as guaranter (if needed) and we should move towards a much more sensible “pay for what you get” system. The amount of money effort spent on running IITs/IIMs could be well spent on primary education.
What education to be given should be left to the “guys on the field” largely, we may have to get out of “one size fits all – matriculation system”. We could devise a “credits based system”. Where having completed so and so courses successfully then you become eligible for so and so courses, plus there should be lot more electives in the education (But these are rather details of the design….)
A minister has a lot of power, if he’s willing to implement, the missing part is the “will” to do it…
gabhijit
May 5, 2008 at 2:55 am